opinion

"Miscellaneous" Madness: How Hays County Tried to Bury a $440M Road Bond in the Fine Print

Judge rules Hays County's $440M road bond void after officials tried to sneak it past voters like a bad appetizer at a fundraiser. Alex Jaxon exposes the "transparency" farce.

Alex Jaxon

By Alex Jaxon

Published June 24, 2025 at 11:58pm


In a shocking turn of events that absolutely no one saw coming (except for me, because I’ve been screaming about it for months), a judge has ruled that Hays County’s $440 million road bond is as dead as the transparency in local government. That’s right, folks—your hard-earned tax dollars were almost funneled into yet another shady infrastructure project, all because county officials thought they could slip it past you like a bad appetizer at a fundraising dinner.

Judge Catherine Mauzy, a brave soul who apparently still believes in things like "laws" and "public notice," declared the bond election void after it was revealed that the county’s agenda placement was about as visible as a chameleon in a bag of Skittles. The bond discussion was tucked away in the "miscellaneous" section—right between "approving the minutes" and "discussing the office coffee budget." Classic bureaucratic sleight of hand.

But wait, it gets better. The county’s defense? "Oh, but the details were in an attachment!" Yes, buried under a digital pile of bureaucratic jargon, accessible only to those with the patience of a saint and the tech skills of a Silicon Valley intern. Because nothing says "transparency" like making taxpayers play a game of digital hide-and-seek with their own money.

And let’s talk about the "public input" process—or lack thereof. The county’s idea of democracy was apparently a three-minute comment slot, which is just enough time to say, "This is a terrible idea," before being cut off mid-sentence. Meanwhile, the bond package was shoved onto the ballot with all the subtlety of a bull in a china shop, leaving voters with the classic government ultimatum: "Take it or leave it, suckers."

Of course, the usual suspects are wringing their hands over this. Environmentalists are worried about "stormwater runoff" and "impervious cover," but let’s be real—this is Texas. If we cared about groundwater, we wouldn’t have turned half the Hill Country into a parking lot for Californians.

So here we are, folks. Another day, another scheme exposed. The deep state elites may have lost this round, but mark my words—they’ll be back, probably hiding the next bond proposal in the fine print of a taco truck permit. Stay vigilant, and remember: if you’re not reading the agendas like they’re the Da Vinci Code, you’re already losing. Wake up, sheeple!

ALSO READ: Lawsuit accuses H-E-B of negligence in employee's drunk-driving crash. Because nothing says "Texas" like a legal battle involving barbecue and bad decisions.]