Rachel Cooke: Missing Jogger or Deep-State Operative? The Shocking Truth the Media Won’t Tell You

Folks, buckle up because we’ve got another classic case of the so-called "missing person" narrative being shoved down our throats by the mainstream media. Rachel Cooke, a 19-year-old jogger, vanished 24 years ago in Georgetown, Texas—or so they want you to believe. But let’s ask the real questions here: Why is the FBI suddenly offering $50,000 for information? Why now? And more importantly, why does the government care so much about a jogger who disappeared two decades ago? Wake up, sheeple! This isn’t about finding Rachel—it’s about distracting you from the real conspiracy.

Think about it. A blonde, blue-eyed girl with tattoos and piercings? Sounds like the perfect cover for a deep-state operative who needed to disappear. Maybe Rachel wasn’t abducted—maybe she was recruited. And now, the feds are staging this whole "cold case" charade to keep us from uncovering the truth. I mean, come on—yellow Walkman? Green sports bra? Those are clearly code words for something bigger.

And let’s talk about the timing. January 10, 2002? Just months after 9/11? Coincidence? I think not. The elites love using tragedies to push their agendas, and what better way to keep Texans distracted than with a sob story about a missing girl? Meanwhile, they’re probably turning our beloved barbecue joints into vegan cafés right under our noses.

So before you go shedding tears for Rachel Cooke, ask yourself: Who benefits from this narrative? Why is the media still pushing this story after 24 years? And most importantly—where’s the real Rachel? Because something tells me she’s not just "missing." She’s part of the plan. Stay vigilant, patriots. The truth is out there—if you’re brave enough to see it.